The hypothesis that biased symptom perception toward excessive symptoms is common when relatively normal chronic patients enter symptom-relating situations, irrespective of emotional variables, was tested in 19 women with severe asthma, 18 with somatization-like characteristics, and 18 controls. Each underwent three experimental conditions: mental stress, resting, and physical exercise. Each condition included three breathing conditions: breathing normally, normal compressed air, and 5.5% CO2-enriched compressed air. Results yielded no group differences in physiological measures, e.g. elevated CO2 in exhaled air (end-tidal partial pressure of CO2, PetCO2), or lung function. Asthma patients experienced more breathlessness, and somatization-like participants more breathlessness, miscellaneous symptoms, and subjective stress than controls. Although these differences suggested acquired biased symptom perception, as it turned out, breathlessness in asthmatics was more influenced by PetCO2 and less by subjective stress compared to controls. Likewise, breathlessness in somatization-like participants was similarly influenced by PetCO2 and subjective stress compared to controls, and miscellaneous symptoms were even more influenced by PetCO2 and less by subjective stress compared to controls. It was concluded that acquired sensitivity to physiological activity associated with habitual symptoms may account for excessive symptoms in patients with chronic health problems.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: It has been hypothesized that general hyperarousal, present during both sleep and wakefulness, may underlie chronic insomnia. The present study explored, under strictly controlled conditions, whether chronic insomnia is associated with altered physiologic markers of arousal, both in absolute levels and in terms of circadian rhythmicity, relative to controls.
DESIGN: A 24-hour constant-routine protocol was implemented to assess physiologic measures.
SETTING: The study was conducted in an isolated, temperature- and light-controlled, sound-attenuated sleep laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS: Eleven subjects with clinically diagnosed chronic insomnia were compared with 13 healthy matched controls.
INTERVENTIONS: The subjects underwent physiologic parameter recordings and cognitive performance testing during 24 hours of total sleep deprivation under strictly controlled circumstances.
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Cardiovascular parameters, free cortisol, and body temperature were subjected to mixed-model analysis of variance and mixed-model harmonic regression. Overall, no differences were found in either the absolute level or the circadian parameters (amplitude, phase) of these variables between the insomniacs and the control subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Although physiologic indexes of arousal were slightly elevated in the insomnia group relative to the controls, the differences between the groups were not statistically significant. This could have been due to a lack of statistical power or could reflect the actual absence of arousal in our sample of chronic insomniacs. Systematic interindividual level differences overwhelmed any differences between the 2 groups, making it unlikely that general hyperarousal was a critical underlying factor in our sample. Earlier findings of hyperarousal in insomnia during studies that allowed sleep may have been specifically related to the sleep state.